From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustycorp.com.au,
vatsa@in.ibm.com, shaohua.li@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] CPU Hotplug support for X86_64
Date: 24 May 2005 14:28:17 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:28:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050524122817.GD86182@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050524081305.149581000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:11:17AM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> This patch tries to eliminate a race condition with IPI broadcast and
> CPU hotplug. Since when we broadcast we dont have control on what cpus
> see a spurious intr, or possiblity of receiving an intr when the cpu is
> just in process of comming up, we choose to send targetted IPI only to online
> cpus.
I thought you had fixed that already in the other patch
with the locking of call_lock. Or did I miss something?
I dont like this patch.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-24 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 8:11 [patch 0/4] CPU Hotplug support for X86_64 Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 8:11 ` [patch 1/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 12:15 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 15:51 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 8:11 ` [patch 2/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 12:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 8:11 ` [patch 3/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-24 8:11 ` [patch 4/4] " Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 12:28 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-24 9:31 ` [patch 0/4] " Shaohua Li
2005-05-25 22:16 ` Matthew Dobson
2005-05-26 0:11 ` Ashok Raj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-24 7:27 Ashok Raj
2005-05-24 7:27 ` [patch 4/4] " Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050524122817.GD86182@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustycorp.com.au \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox