From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 00/03] cfq: various fixes
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:34:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050525073429.GA13068@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050524163518.0DA61D6C@htj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 25 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jens.
>
> This patchset is various fixes to cfq. All patches are against
> 2.6.12-rc4-mm2.
>
> One thing that isn't fixed in this patchset but I think might be
> problematic is the priority of async queue. It seems that the async
> queue doesn't receive any special attention regarding its priority.
> It just follows normal rules and its priority jumps irregularly.
> If I'm missing something, plz point out.
>
> [ Start of patch descriptions ]
>
> 01_cfq_INSERT_BACK_fix.patch
> : cfq ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK fix
>
> When inserting INSERT_BACK request, cfq_insert_request() calls
> cfq_dispatch_requests() repetitively until it returns zero
> indicating no request is dispatched. This used to flush all
> the requests in the queue to the dispatch queue but, with idle
> slice implemented, the current active queue may decide to wait
> for new request using slice_timer. When this happens, 0 is
> returned from cfq_dispatch_requests() even when other cfqq's
> have pending requests. This breaks INSRET_BACK semantics.
>
> This patch adds @force argument which, when set to non-zero,
> disables idle_slice, and uses the argument when flushing
> cfqq's for INSERT_BACK. While at it, use INT_MAX instead of
> cfq_quantum when flushing cfqq's, as we're gonna dump all the
> requests and using cfq_quantum does nothing but adding
> unnecessary iterations.
>
> 02_cfq_ioc_leak_fix.patch
> : cfq_io_context leak fix
>
> When a process has more than one cic's associated with it,
> only the first one was kmem_cache_free'd in the original code.
> This patch frees all cic's in cfq_free_io_context().
>
> While at it, remove unnecessary refcounting from cic's to ioc.
> This reference is created when each cic is created and removed
> altogether when the ioc is exited, and, thus, serves no
> purpose.
>
> 03_cfq_remove_unused_fields.patch
> : remove serveral unused fields from cfq data structures
>
> cfq_data->idle_start, cfq_data->end_prio and cfq_rq->end_pos
> are not used in meaningful way. Remove'em.
All three patches look good, thanks!
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-25 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 16:35 [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 00/03] cfq: various fixes Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 01/03] cfq: cfq ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK fix Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 02/03] cfq: cfq_io_context leak fix Tejun Heo
2005-05-24 16:35 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 03/03] cfq: remove serveral unused fields from cfq data structures Tejun Heo
2005-05-25 7:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050525073429.GA13068@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox