Re: RT patch acceptance

Duncan Sands
2005-05-27T14:27:33Z

> Yes, as Ingo stated many times, addition cond_resched() to
> might_sleep() does achieve the "usable" latencies -- and obviously
> that's hacky.
>
> So, the only question is whether changing (inserting) cond_resched()
> to all points would be acceptable even if it results in a big amount
> of changes...

Or change (almost) all calls to might_sleep() into calls to
cond_reched(), and put a might_sleep() inside cond_reched().

Ciao,

D.