From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
ashok.raj@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]CPU hotplug breaks wake_up_new_task
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:10:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050531094045.GA9884@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117524909.3820.11.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:29:39AM +0000, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Hi,
> There is a race condition at wake_up_new_task at CPU hotplug case.
> Say do_fork
> copy_process (which sets new forked task's current cpu, cpu_allowed)
> <-------- the new forked task's current cpu is offline
> wake_up_new_task
> wake_up_new_task will put the forked task into a dead cpu.
This was noticed/fixed long back. Apparently somebody has reintroduced
the bug. The simple fix for this race is:
--- kernel/fork.c.org 2005-05-31 14:57:15.000000000 +0530
+++ kernel/fork.c 2005-05-31 15:07:20.000000000 +0530
@@ -1024,8 +1024,7 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
* parent's CPU). This avoids alot of nasty races.
*/
p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
- if (unlikely(!cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_allowed)))
- set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
+ set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
/*
* Check for pending SIGKILL! The new thread should not be allowed
Could you test and check if it avoids whatever problem you are seeing?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-31 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-31 7:35 [PATCH]CPU hotplug breaks wake_up_new_task Shaohua Li
2005-05-31 8:00 ` Ashok Raj
2005-05-31 8:35 ` Shaohua Li
2005-05-31 8:50 ` Nick Piggin
2005-05-31 9:11 ` Shaohua Li
2005-05-31 9:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-05-31 9:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2005-05-31 9:46 ` Nick Piggin
2005-05-31 10:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-05-31 10:49 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-31 11:41 Li, Shaohua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050531094045.GA9884@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox