public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] TASK_NONINTERACTIVE (was: Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:35:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050601073544.GA21384@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <courier.429C05C1.00005CC5@courier.cs.helsinki.fi>


Pekka, could you check whether the patch below solves your Wine problem 
(without hurting interactivity otherwise)?

	Ingo

----

this patch implements a task state bit (TASK_NONINTERACTIVE), which can 
be used by blocking points to mark the task's wait as "non-interactive".
This does not mean the task will be considered a CPU-hog - the wait will
simply not have an effect on the waiting task's priority - positive or
negative alike. Right now only pipe_wait() will make use of it, because
it's a common source of not-so-interactive waits (kernel compilation
jobs, etc.).

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- linux/fs/pipe.c.orig
+++ linux/fs/pipe.c
@@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ void pipe_wait(struct inode * inode)
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
-	prepare_to_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	/*
+	 * Pipes are system-local resources, so sleeping on them
+	 * is considered a noninteractive wait:
+	 */
+	prepare_to_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_NONINTERACTIVE);
 	up(PIPE_SEM(*inode));
 	schedule();
 	finish_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait);
--- linux/kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,16 @@ out_activate:
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * Tasks that have marked their sleep as noninteractive get
+	 * woken up without updating their sleep average. (i.e. their
+	 * sleep is handled in a priority-neutral manner, no priority
+	 * boost and no penalty.)
+	 */
+	if (old_state & TASK_NONINTERACTIVE)
+		__activate_task(p, rq);
+	else
+		activate_task(p, rq, cpu == this_cpu);
+	/*
 	 * Sync wakeups (i.e. those types of wakeups where the waker
 	 * has indicated that it will leave the CPU in short order)
 	 * don't trigger a preemption, if the woken up task will run on
@@ -1092,7 +1102,6 @@ out_activate:
 	 * the waker guarantees that the freshly woken up task is going
 	 * to be considered on this CPU.)
 	 */
-	activate_task(p, rq, cpu == this_cpu);
 	if (!sync || cpu != this_cpu) {
 		if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq))
 			resched_task(rq->curr);
--- linux/include/linux/sched.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ extern unsigned long nr_iowait(void);
 #define TASK_TRACED		8
 #define EXIT_ZOMBIE		16
 #define EXIT_DEAD		32
+#define TASK_NONINTERACTIVE	64
 
 #define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value)		\
 	do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-01  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-28 14:46 [PROBLEM] Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 18:20   ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 18:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 20:49       ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 22:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 23:06           ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-30 15:23           ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-30 17:31             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 18:07               ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-30 18:22                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-30 18:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 18:25                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 19:12                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 13:54                   ` Greg Stark
2005-05-31  6:15               ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-05-31  6:35               ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-05-31  6:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 16:53                   ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-31 17:24                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-31 18:41                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 21:20                         ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-01  0:07                           ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01  2:31                             ` David Lang
2005-06-01  7:35                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-06-01  8:42                   ` TASK_NONINTERACTIVE (was: Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office) Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-01  8:55                   ` [patch] " Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 10:26                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-01 18:06                   ` [patch] " Gene Heskett
2005-06-03  8:34                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-03 10:57                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-07 13:14                       ` Pekka Enberg
2005-10-17 15:10                   ` [patch] " Pekka Enberg
2005-10-17 15:15                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050601073544.GA21384@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=penberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox