From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] TASK_NONINTERACTIVE (was: Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:35:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050601073544.GA21384@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <courier.429C05C1.00005CC5@courier.cs.helsinki.fi>
Pekka, could you check whether the patch below solves your Wine problem
(without hurting interactivity otherwise)?
Ingo
----
this patch implements a task state bit (TASK_NONINTERACTIVE), which can
be used by blocking points to mark the task's wait as "non-interactive".
This does not mean the task will be considered a CPU-hog - the wait will
simply not have an effect on the waiting task's priority - positive or
negative alike. Right now only pipe_wait() will make use of it, because
it's a common source of not-so-interactive waits (kernel compilation
jobs, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
--- linux/fs/pipe.c.orig
+++ linux/fs/pipe.c
@@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ void pipe_wait(struct inode * inode)
{
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- prepare_to_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ /*
+ * Pipes are system-local resources, so sleeping on them
+ * is considered a noninteractive wait:
+ */
+ prepare_to_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_NONINTERACTIVE);
up(PIPE_SEM(*inode));
schedule();
finish_wait(PIPE_WAIT(*inode), &wait);
--- linux/kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,16 @@ out_activate:
}
/*
+ * Tasks that have marked their sleep as noninteractive get
+ * woken up without updating their sleep average. (i.e. their
+ * sleep is handled in a priority-neutral manner, no priority
+ * boost and no penalty.)
+ */
+ if (old_state & TASK_NONINTERACTIVE)
+ __activate_task(p, rq);
+ else
+ activate_task(p, rq, cpu == this_cpu);
+ /*
* Sync wakeups (i.e. those types of wakeups where the waker
* has indicated that it will leave the CPU in short order)
* don't trigger a preemption, if the woken up task will run on
@@ -1092,7 +1102,6 @@ out_activate:
* the waker guarantees that the freshly woken up task is going
* to be considered on this CPU.)
*/
- activate_task(p, rq, cpu == this_cpu);
if (!sync || cpu != this_cpu) {
if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq))
resched_task(rq->curr);
--- linux/include/linux/sched.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ extern unsigned long nr_iowait(void);
#define TASK_TRACED 8
#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 16
#define EXIT_DEAD 32
+#define TASK_NONINTERACTIVE 64
#define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-01 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-28 14:46 [PROBLEM] Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 18:20 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 20:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-29 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-29 23:06 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-30 15:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-30 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 18:07 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-30 18:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-30 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-30 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 13:54 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-31 6:15 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-05-31 6:35 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-05-31 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 16:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-05-31 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-31 18:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-31 21:20 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-06-01 0:07 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 2:31 ` David Lang
2005-06-01 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-06-01 8:42 ` TASK_NONINTERACTIVE (was: Machine Freezes while Running Crossover Office) Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-01 8:55 ` [patch] " Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 10:26 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-01 18:06 ` [patch] " Gene Heskett
2005-06-03 8:34 ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-06-03 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-07 13:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-10-17 15:10 ` [patch] " Pekka Enberg
2005-10-17 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050601073544.GA21384@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox