From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261500AbVFASNr@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261500AbVFASNr (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:13:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261504AbVFASMw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:12:52 -0400
Received: from hummeroutlaws.com ([12.161.0.3]:36104 "EHLO atpro.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261500AbVFASBi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:01:38 -0400
From: "Jim Crilly" <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:59:21 -0400
To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: toon@hout.vanvergehaald.nl, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, ltd@cisco.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kraxel@suse.de, dtor_core@ameritech.net,
       7eggert@gmx.de
Subject: Re: OT] Joerg Schilling flames Linux on his Blog
Message-ID: <20050601175920.GD14299@voodoo>
Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>,
	toon@hout.vanvergehaald.nl, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, ltd@cisco.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kraxel@suse.de,
	dtor_core@ameritech.net, 7eggert@gmx.de
References: <20050530093420.GB15347@hout.vanvergehaald.nl> <429B0683.nail5764GYTVC@burner> <46BE0C64-1246-4259-914B-379071712F01@mac.com> <429C4483.nail5X0215WJQ@burner> <87acmbxrfu.fsf@bytesex.org> <429DD036.nail7BF7MRZT6@burner> <20050601154245.GA14299@voodoo> <429DE874.nail7BFM1RBO2@burner> <20050601172900.GC14299@voodoo> <429DF581.nail7BFUL8PFN@burner>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <429DF581.nail7BFUL8PFN@burner>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 06/01/05 07:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Jim Crilly" <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net> wrote:
> 
> > I don't use cdda2wav so I can't comment, but every other ripping tool that
> > I've used on Linux has had no problem using the /dev/whatever interface, so
> > once again it appears that your tool is the blacksheep for no good reason.
> 
> You should use it as it is even used by people on Win32 because it is the
> best DAE program for even badly readable sources.

I'm not an audiophile, I can't tell the difference between a mp3 encoded at
128k and one encoded at 160k so I really doubt I could tell the difference
between what cdda2wav and what most other DAE programs would produce. So
given that the quality of the rips will be effectively equal to my ears,
I'll use whatever's most convenient.

> 
> Jörg
> 

Jim.