* [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
@ 2005-06-01 18:02 Martin Schwidefsky
2005-06-02 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2005-06-01 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, linux-kernel
[patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@de.ibm.com>
Fix max channel check in cio_ignore display function.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
diffstat:
drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c
--- linux-2.6/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c 2005-03-02 08:37:53.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c 2005-06-01 19:43:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/*
* drivers/s390/cio/blacklist.c
* S/390 common I/O routines -- blacklisting of specific devices
- * $Revision: 1.33 $
+ * $Revision: 1.34 $
*
* Copyright (C) 1999-2002 IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH,
* IBM Corporation
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int cio_ignore_read (char *page,
len = 0;
for (devno = off; /* abuse the page variable
* as counter, see fs/proc/generic.c */
- devno <= __MAX_SUBCHANNELS && len + entry_size < count; devno++) {
+ devno < __MAX_SUBCHANNELS && len + entry_size < count; devno++) {
if (!test_bit(devno, bl_dev))
continue;
len += sprintf(page + len, "0.0.%04lx", devno);
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int cio_ignore_read (char *page,
len += sprintf(page + len, "\n");
}
- if (devno <= __MAX_SUBCHANNELS)
+ if (devno < __MAX_SUBCHANNELS)
*eof = 1;
*start = (char *) (devno - off); /* number of checked entries */
return len;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
2005-06-01 18:02 [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2005-06-02 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 8:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-06-02 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky; +Cc: linux-kernel
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
2005-06-02 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2005-06-03 8:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2005-06-03 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
> > [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.
>
> Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?
All the patches are pretty short but if I had to choose I'd say
at least the following 4 patches should go into 2.6.12:
[patch 3/11] s390: ptrace peek and poke.
[patch 4/11] s390: uml ptrace fixes.
[patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic.
[patch 9/11] s390: deadlock in appldata.
blue skies,
Martin
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-03 8:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-01 18:02 [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks Martin Schwidefsky
2005-06-02 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 8:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox