public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Freezer Patches.
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:14:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602071431.GA1841@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117676753.10888.105.camel@localhost>

Hi!

> > > > swsusp1 should not need any special casing of sync, right? We can
> > > > simply do sys_sync(), then freeze, or something like that. We could
> > > > even remove sys_sync() completely; it is not needed for correctness.
> 
> Wrong. I guess you're only trying it on a machine that isn't actually
> doing anything :). I've forgotten whether it was this freezer
> implementation or the last, but we've been testing freezing processes
> when the load average exceeds 100. If you have a thread that is syncing
> and another that's submitting I/O continually (think dd, for example),
> you want this.

If sys_sync() is not working, *fix sys_sync()*. [BTW I see that
problem before and I think it is being worked on.] I'm *not* going to
work around it in refrigerator.

								Pavel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-02  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-01 12:33 Freezer Patches Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-01 13:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-01 22:02   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-01 22:13     ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-01 22:23       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-01 22:08   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-01 22:31     ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-01 22:45       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-01 23:02         ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-02  0:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-02  1:46             ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-02  1:49               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-02  1:45           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-02  1:48             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-02  7:14             ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-06-02  7:26               ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-02  7:31                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-02  7:36                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-02  8:18                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-06-02 21:47                       ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050602071431.GA1841@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox