From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261237AbVFBSv4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:51:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261240AbVFBSv4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:51:56 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:44807 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261237AbVFBSvy (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:51:54 -0400 Date: 2 Jun 2005 20:51:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:51:53 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: YhLu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc5 is broken in nvidia Ck804 Opteron MB/with dual cor e dual way Message-ID: <20050602185153.GG1683@muc.de> References: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230A403903@TYANWEB> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230A403903@TYANWEB> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:26:00PM -0700, YhLu wrote: > Brought up 4 CPUs > CPU 0, cpu_sibling_map[0]= 1 > CPU 0, cpu_core_map[0]= 3 > CPU 1, cpu_sibling_map[1]= 2 > CPU 1, cpu_core_map[1]= 3 > CPU 2, cpu_sibling_map[2]= 4 > CPU 2, cpu_core_map[2]= c > CPU 3, cpu_sibling_map[3]= 8 > CPU 3, cpu_core_map[3]= c > are the cpu_sibling_map[] right? Yes it is correct. A CPU is always a sibling of itself. -Andi