public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	Matt_Domsch@Dell.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new DellBIOS update driver
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:29:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050603192953.GA7435@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <367215741E167A4CA813C8F12CE0143B3ED3A9@ausx2kmpc115.aus.amer.dell.com>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No no no.  Just because you are using the firmware interface, does
> not
> > > > mean you need to add this extra round-trip to the whole system.
> Just
> > > > dump the firmware to the /sys/firmware/whatever... file whenever
> you
> > > > want to, that's all that is needed.  No hotplug stuff, no filename
> > > > stuff, just a simple copy.
> > > Greg, all the feedback gave the impression that request_firmwae
> hotplug
> > > stuff was the way to go.
> > 
> > It is the way to go.
> > 
> > > Seems it's not required!
> > 
> > Not at all, why do you think I mean that?
> I meant this driver does not need hotplug per say and just a copy should
> be enough (if we decide to go with bin attribute for data file).

But the firmware code handles the memory stuff that you duplicated
already.  That's a big win too.

> > > Now that means it needs to be done the way it was before except that
> > > it needs to have a bin attribute for data and a normal attribute for
> > > size.  This would be even better as it makes it easy to read back
> the
> > > data.
> > 
> > No, you can still use the firmware core code, that's what it is there
> > for.  But don't mess with the "make the user provide a filename"
> stuff.
> > Just have your driver create the firmware request and then relax.
> Your
> > code will get called when the firware is written to, right?  That's
> all
> > you need.
> > 
> At what point I should be calling request_firmware?

Never, you should call request_firmware_nowait() instead.  And do it
from your module init function.

> As my driver does
> not have any entry points. In this driver it is called when the user is
> ready to download the firmware image (when it echoes the firmware image
> name). Also the driver needs to be resident for handling multiple such
> requests; that's why cannot do this at driver init time.

That's what request_firmware_nowait() is for.

> When ever the user echoes the file name, it gets passed on to
> request_firmware and the $FIRMWARE env gets populated with the file
> name. thus making the hotplug code to automatically load the image which
> is passed back as fw->data and fw->size. 

It's easier for the user to just copy the firmware to the sysfs file
whenever they want to.  No messing with hotplug events or filenames.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-03 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-03 19:00 [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new DellBIOS update driver Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 19:29 ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-07 14:47 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-07 15:01 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 20:22 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 20:35 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 20:01 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 20:12 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 18:54 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 19:22 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 16:27 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 18:16 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 19:57 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 20:33 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 13:30 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 16:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-06-03 18:03 ` Greg KH
2005-06-02 22:25 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-02 22:45 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-06-02 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-03  5:19 ` Greg KH
2005-05-23 15:36 Abhay_Salunke
2005-05-23 15:50 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050603192953.GA7435@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox