From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: tom.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, roland@topspin.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: pci_enable_msi() for everyone?
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:45:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050603224551.GA10014@kroah.com> (raw)
In talking with a few people about the MSI kernel code, they asked why
we can't just do the pci_enable_msi() call for every pci device in the
system (at somewhere like pci_enable_device() time or so). That would
let all drivers and devices get the MSI functionality without changing
their code, and probably make the api a whole lot simpler.
Now I know the e1000 driver would have to specifically disable MSI for
some of their broken versions, and possibly some other drivers might
need this, but the downside seems quite small.
Or am I missing something pretty obvious here?
thanks,
greg k-h
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-03 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 22:45 Greg KH [this message]
2005-06-03 23:16 ` pci_enable_msi() for everyone? Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 0:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 0:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 6:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 23:36 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-06 22:58 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 0:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:19 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 1:31 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-04 6:48 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 7:05 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-04 7:18 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 7:23 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-04 14:58 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-06 23:01 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 0:26 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:22 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 5:46 ` Adam Belay
2005-06-07 17:43 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-06-05 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-06 23:00 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-05 19:46 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 22:55 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 22:59 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 23:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-06 23:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 23:13 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-06 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:58 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-07 4:24 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-07 0:18 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:21 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-07 22:33 Nguyen, Tom L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050603224551.GA10014@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox