public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Hang in sched_balance_self()
@ 2005-06-03 22:55 Jack Steiner
  2005-06-04  2:09 ` Nick Piggin
  2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Steiner @ 2005-06-03 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nickpiggin; +Cc: linux-kernel


Nick -

The latest 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 tree fails to boot on some of the 64p
SGI systems. The system hangs immediately after printing:

	...
	Inode-cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 12, 67108864 bytes)
	Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024
	Boot processor id 0x0/0x0
	Brought up 64 CPUs
	Total of 64 processors activated (118415.36 BogoMIPS).


I have isolated the failure to cpu 0 hanging in sched_balance_self() during
a fork (or clone).  The "while" loop at the end of function never 
terminates, ie. sd is never NULL.

Is this a problem that you have seen before. If not, I'll do some
more digging & isolate the problem.


-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com)          651-683-5302
Principal Engineer                      SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Hang in sched_balance_self()
  2005-06-03 22:55 Hang in sched_balance_self() Jack Steiner
@ 2005-06-04  2:09 ` Nick Piggin
  2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2005-06-04  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Steiner; +Cc: linux-kernel

Jack Steiner wrote:
> Nick -
> 
> The latest 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 tree fails to boot on some of the 64p
> SGI systems. The system hangs immediately after printing:
> 
> 	...
> 	Inode-cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 12, 67108864 bytes)
> 	Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024
> 	Boot processor id 0x0/0x0
> 	Brought up 64 CPUs
> 	Total of 64 processors activated (118415.36 BogoMIPS).
> 
> 
> I have isolated the failure to cpu 0 hanging in sched_balance_self() during
> a fork (or clone).  The "while" loop at the end of function never 
> terminates, ie. sd is never NULL.
> 
> Is this a problem that you have seen before. If not, I'll do some
> more digging & isolate the problem.
> 

Hi Jack,
I have not seen this problem, however I don't think it has
had much testing with multilevel NUMA domains.

If you could do some more digging that would be great, however
I plan to get time on a 64-way IA64 next week and look at
some scheduler issues, so I'll keep this in mind if you haven't
made any progress.

Thanks,
Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Hang in sched_balance_self()
  2005-06-03 22:55 Hang in sched_balance_self() Jack Steiner
  2005-06-04  2:09 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
  2005-06-07 14:54   ` Jack Steiner
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2005-06-07 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jack Steiner; +Cc: linux-kernel, John Hawkes

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

Jack Steiner wrote:
> Nick -
> 
> The latest 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 tree fails to boot on some of the 64p
> SGI systems. The system hangs immediately after printing:
> 
> 	...
> 	Inode-cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 12, 67108864 bytes)
> 	Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024
> 	Boot processor id 0x0/0x0
> 	Brought up 64 CPUs
> 	Total of 64 processors activated (118415.36 BogoMIPS).
> 
> 
> I have isolated the failure to cpu 0 hanging in sched_balance_self() during
> a fork (or clone).  The "while" loop at the end of function never 
> terminates, ie. sd is never NULL.
> 
> Is this a problem that you have seen before. If not, I'll do some
> more digging & isolate the problem.
> 

Hi Jack,
I haven't completely got to the bottom of this yet, but I was able
to reproduce on a 64-way Altix, and something like the attached patch
seems to 'fix' the problem.

I didn't have time to find what's gone wrong tonight, but I'll get
to that tomorrow.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


[-- Attachment #2: sched-balance-self-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 745 bytes --]

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:01:53.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:02:47.000000000 +1000
@@ -1113,6 +1113,7 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
 		cpumask_t span;
 		struct sched_group *group;
 		int new_cpu;
+		int weight;
 
 		span = sd->span;
 		group = find_idlest_group(sd, t, cpu);
@@ -1127,8 +1128,9 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
 		cpu = new_cpu;
 nextlevel:
 		sd = NULL;
+		weight = cpus_weight(span);
 		for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
-			if (cpus_subset(span, tmp->span))
+			if (weight <= cpus_weight(tmp->span))
 				break;
 			if (tmp->flags & flag)
 				sd = tmp;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Hang in sched_balance_self()
  2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2005-06-07 14:54   ` Jack Steiner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jack Steiner @ 2005-06-07 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: linux-kernel, John Hawkes

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:09:09AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Jack Steiner wrote:
> >Nick -
> >
> >The latest 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 tree fails to boot on some of the 64p
> >SGI systems. The system hangs immediately after printing:
> >
> >	...
> >	Inode-cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 12, 67108864 bytes)
> >	Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024
> >	Boot processor id 0x0/0x0
> >	Brought up 64 CPUs
> >	Total of 64 processors activated (118415.36 BogoMIPS).
> >
> >
> >I have isolated the failure to cpu 0 hanging in sched_balance_self() during
> >a fork (or clone).  The "while" loop at the end of function never 
> >terminates, ie. sd is never NULL.
> >
> >Is this a problem that you have seen before. If not, I'll do some
> >more digging & isolate the problem.
> >
> 
> Hi Jack,
> I haven't completely got to the bottom of this yet, but I was able
> to reproduce on a 64-way Altix, and something like the attached patch
> seems to 'fix' the problem.

The fix works for me. 

I'll send you notes that I collected. They may help explain
what is going wrong. (I learned a lot about scheduler domains...:-)


> 
> I didn't have time to find what's gone wrong tonight, but I'll get
> to that tomorrow.
> 
> -- 
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
> 

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:01:53.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:02:47.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1113,6 +1113,7 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
>  		cpumask_t span;
>  		struct sched_group *group;
>  		int new_cpu;
> +		int weight;
>  
>  		span = sd->span;
>  		group = find_idlest_group(sd, t, cpu);
> @@ -1127,8 +1128,9 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
>  		cpu = new_cpu;
>  nextlevel:
>  		sd = NULL;
> +		weight = cpus_weight(span);
>  		for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
> -			if (cpus_subset(span, tmp->span))
> +			if (weight <= cpus_weight(tmp->span))
>  				break;
>  			if (tmp->flags & flag)
>  				sd = tmp;


-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com)          651-683-5302
Principal Engineer                      SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-07 15:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-03 22:55 Hang in sched_balance_self() Jack Steiner
2005-06-04  2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-07 14:54   ` Jack Steiner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox