From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261631AbVFFSQG (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:16:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261635AbVFFSQE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:16:04 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9915 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261624AbVFFSPi (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:15:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:15:24 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Jan Kara Cc: Holger Kiehl , linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.11.11 Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() Message-ID: <20050606181524.GA9153@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050606134253.GB2130@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050606134253.GB2130@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jan Kara (jack@suse.cz) wrote: > The kernel stopped because it detected a disk buffer in an unexpected > state. 2.6.12-rc5 kernel should contain some more fixes than 2.6.11.11 > for similar problems so you can try that kernel. If you are able to see > the same problem with 2.6.12-rc5 then let us know please. Do you feel any of those fixes are stable enough for -stable? Especially this one looks ok: Subject: [PATCH] Fix log_do_checkpoint() assertion failure Message-ID: <20050601074059.GD5933@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> thanks, -chris