public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Phillip Hellewell <phillip@hellewell.homeip.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3, 2.6.12-rc5-mm1] eCryptfs: export user key type
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:42:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050606184212.GD7947@halcrow.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16336.1118050922@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:42:02AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL( key_type_user );
> > 
> > This is the only modification necessary to support eCryptfs.
> 
> Unfortunately, that might have to be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() nowadays
> since I reimplemented the predefined keyring types of user and
> keyring using RCU.

Noted; new patch included below.

> > While we are working on getting it ready for merging into the
> > mainline kernel, we would like to distribute it as a separate
> > kernel module, and we would like for users or distro's do not need
> > to modify their kernels to build and run it.
> 
> "It" being?

eCryptfs.

> > Would there be any objections to exporting the key_type_user
> > symbol?  Is there any general reason why kernel modules should not
> > have access to the user key type struct?
> 
> No and no, but see above. You could also export the user defined key
> type ops and define your own key type using them.

I can imagine scenarios where new kernel modules make use some
universal key type (i.e., without userspace apps having to be aware of
a special keytype).  The ``user'' key type seems like a good candidate
for that.

Signed off by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>

--- linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1/security/keys/user_defined.c	2005-05-28 17:18:52.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-ecryptfs/security/keys/user_defined.c	2005-06-06 13:26:58.757403080 -0500
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
 	char		data[0];	/* actual data */
 };
 
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(key_type_user);
+
 /*****************************************************************************/
 /*
  * instantiate a user defined key

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-06 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-02  5:48 [PATCH 2/3] eCryptfs: export key type Phillip Hellewell
2005-06-03 20:03 ` Michael Halcrow
2005-06-06  9:42   ` David Howells
2005-06-06 18:42     ` Michael Halcrow [this message]
2005-06-07  9:52       ` [PATCH 2/3, 2.6.12-rc5-mm1] eCryptfs: export user " David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050606184212.GD7947@halcrow.us \
    --to=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillip@hellewell.homeip.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox