From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
Matt_Domsch@Dell.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new DellBIOS update driver
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:12:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050606201238.GA13214@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <367215741E167A4CA813C8F12CE0143B3ED3AD@ausx2kmpc115.aus.amer.dell.com>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:01:04PM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com wrote:
> > Ok, in re-reading the firmware code, you are correct, it will still
> > timeout in 10 seconds and call your callback.
> >
> > Which, in my opinion, is wrong. We should have some way to say "wait
> > forever". Care to change the firmware_class.c code to support this?
> Will give it a try. So far the request_firmware code calls
> kobject_hotplug with action as KOBJ_ADD. It invokes a hotplug script
> form user mode. I guess we need to have some reverse mechanism which is
> invoked when a user writes to the file.
Why? Your completion function should be called when the file is closed,
right?
> > I was assuming that this would wait forever, and is why I pointed you
> in
> > this direction. Sorry about the confusion here.
> >
> I guess the earlier method of request_firmware would work out as is with
> the only disadvantage of the user having to depend on hotplug mechanism
> and echoing firmware name.
> Let me know if that is acceptable till we find a solution to wait for
> ever without using hotplug stuff.
Why not fix the firmware_class.c code now? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-06 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-06 20:01 [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new DellBIOS update driver Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 20:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-07 14:47 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-07 15:01 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 20:22 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 20:35 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 18:54 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 19:22 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 16:27 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-06 18:16 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 19:57 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 20:33 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 19:00 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 19:29 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 13:30 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-03 16:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-06-03 18:03 ` Greg KH
2005-06-02 22:25 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-02 22:45 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-06-02 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-03 5:19 ` Greg KH
2005-05-23 15:36 Abhay_Salunke
2005-05-23 15:50 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050606201238.GA13214@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox