From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261697AbVFFVlq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:41:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261698AbVFFVlq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:41:46 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:35555 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261697AbVFFVlj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:41:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:41:24 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.12-rc6 Message-ID: <20050606214124.GL2230@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050606192654.GA3155@elf.ucw.cz> <20050606201441.GG2230@elf.ucw.cz> <20050606211849.GK2230@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > I thought you are taking "first From: in the body", not "From: only if > > it is first line in the body". [Could you perhaps modify your scripts > > to take "first From: in the body"? It seems logical to put From "near" > > Signed-of-by: lines... > > I really don't want to, for a number of reasons. Most notably because I > don't want to mix things up with the sign-off, because authorship and > sign-off are really separate things (sign-offs accumulate, authorship > stays), but also because it's not entirely unambiguous to parse these > things. With the "first line only" rule, it ends up being pretty clear > what's going on when the script suddenly ate one line.. Okay, I see. I'm little afraid that during forwards blank line will be inserted before "From: " and break this, but lets see how it works. Pavel