From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261805AbVFGBXF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:23:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261806AbVFGBXF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:23:05 -0400 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6]:6149 "EHLO lakshmi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261805AbVFGBXC (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:23:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:40:38 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] UML - Clean up tt mode remapping of UML binary Message-ID: <20050607004038.GA12466@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200506062008.j56K89YA008957@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200506070105.20422.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506070105.20422.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:05:19AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > NACK at all, definitely, don't apply this one please. This patch: > > 1) On i386 does not fix the problem it was supposed to fix when I originately > sent the first version (i.e. avoiding to create a .thread_private section to > allow linking against NPTL glibc). It's done on x86_64 and forgot on i386. > 2) Splitting the linker script for subarchs is definitely not needed. > 3) This removes the fix (done through objcopy -G switcheroo) to a link time > conflict happening on some weird glibc combinations. > > I'll merge this work when it's ready. OK, Andrew, just drop this one for now. Jeff