From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261721AbVFGFV2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:21:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261725AbVFGFV2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:21:28 -0400 Received: from lyle.provo.novell.com ([137.65.81.174]:62309 "EHLO lyle.provo.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261721AbVFGFVW (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:21:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:21:16 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Roland Dreier Cc: "David S. Miller" , tom.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci_enable_msi() for everyone? Message-ID: <20050607052116.GC17734@suse.de> References: <20050603224551.GA10014@kroah.com> <20050605.124612.63111065.davem@davemloft.net> <20050606225548.GA11184@suse.de> <52ekbfj9xy.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52ekbfj9xy.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:18:49PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Greg> That's fine to disable msi, I don't have an issue with that. > Greg> I'm just getting pushback from some vendors as to why MSI > Greg> isn't explicitly enabled by default and I don't have any > Greg> solid answers. > > Why don't those vendors push back on their own behalf, on public > mailing lists? Heh, that's always the question... They are on these lists, and should probably speak up. Oh yeah, Tom, any opinions on this topic? (note, Intel is not the vendor pushing, just to squash any rumors...) thanks, greg k-h