public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Hawkes <hawkes@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Hang in sched_balance_self()
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:54:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050607145431.GA7452@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A5AA85.60709@yahoo.com.au>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:09:09AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Jack Steiner wrote:
> >Nick -
> >
> >The latest 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 tree fails to boot on some of the 64p
> >SGI systems. The system hangs immediately after printing:
> >
> >	...
> >	Inode-cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 12, 67108864 bytes)
> >	Mount-cache hash table entries: 1024
> >	Boot processor id 0x0/0x0
> >	Brought up 64 CPUs
> >	Total of 64 processors activated (118415.36 BogoMIPS).
> >
> >
> >I have isolated the failure to cpu 0 hanging in sched_balance_self() during
> >a fork (or clone).  The "while" loop at the end of function never 
> >terminates, ie. sd is never NULL.
> >
> >Is this a problem that you have seen before. If not, I'll do some
> >more digging & isolate the problem.
> >
> 
> Hi Jack,
> I haven't completely got to the bottom of this yet, but I was able
> to reproduce on a 64-way Altix, and something like the attached patch
> seems to 'fix' the problem.

The fix works for me. 

I'll send you notes that I collected. They may help explain
what is going wrong. (I learned a lot about scheduler domains...:-)


> 
> I didn't have time to find what's gone wrong tonight, but I'll get
> to that tomorrow.
> 
> -- 
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
> 

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:01:53.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c	2005-06-08 00:02:47.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1113,6 +1113,7 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
>  		cpumask_t span;
>  		struct sched_group *group;
>  		int new_cpu;
> +		int weight;
>  
>  		span = sd->span;
>  		group = find_idlest_group(sd, t, cpu);
> @@ -1127,8 +1128,9 @@ static int sched_balance_self(int cpu, i
>  		cpu = new_cpu;
>  nextlevel:
>  		sd = NULL;
> +		weight = cpus_weight(span);
>  		for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
> -			if (cpus_subset(span, tmp->span))
> +			if (weight <= cpus_weight(tmp->span))
>  				break;
>  			if (tmp->flags & flag)
>  				sd = tmp;


-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com)          651-683-5302
Principal Engineer                      SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc.



      reply	other threads:[~2005-06-07 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-03 22:55 Hang in sched_balance_self() Jack Steiner
2005-06-04  2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-07 14:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-07 14:54   ` Jack Steiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050607145431.GA7452@sgi.com \
    --to=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox