From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
greg@kroah.com,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
Morton Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, awilliam@fc.hp.com,
bjorn.helgaas@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Kdump: Disabling PCI interrupts in capture kernel
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:21:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050607162143.GE29220@colo.lackof.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1slzuwkqx.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:59:18AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > *lots* of PCI devices predate PCI2.3. Possibly even the majority.
>
> In general generic hardware bits for disabling DMA, disabling interrupts
> and the like are all advisory. With the current architecture things
> will work properly even if you don't manage to disable DMA (assuming
> you don't reassign IOMMU entries at least).
ISTR, pSeries (IBM), some alpha, some sparc64, and parisc (64-bit) require
use of the IOMMU for *any* DMA. ie IOMMU entries need to be programmed.
Probably want to make a choice to ignore those arches for now
or sort out how to deal with an IOMMU.
> Shared interrupts are an interesting case. The simplest solution I can
> think of for a crash dump capture kernel is to periodically poll
> the hardware, as if all interrupts are shared. At that level
> I think we could get away with ignoring all hardware interrupt sources.
Yes, that's perfectly ok. We are no longer in a multitasking env.
> Does anyone know of a anything that would break by always polling
> the hardware? I guess there could be a problem with drivers
> that don't understand shared interrupts, are there enough of those
> to be an issue.
PCI requires drivers support Shared IRQs.
A few oddballs might be broken but I expect networking/mass storage
drivers get this right.
grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-07 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 3:07 [RFC/PATCH] Kdump: Disabling PCI interrupts in capture kernel Vivek Goyal
2005-06-07 5:07 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-07 9:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-07 16:21 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2005-06-07 18:42 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-08 4:02 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-08 4:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-08 6:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-06-08 11:23 ` Vivek Goyal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-07 11:56 Vivek Goyal
[not found] <4bExX-3uT-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-04 12:38 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-06-04 10:57 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-04 15:35 ` Alan Stern
2005-06-04 18:26 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-04 10:43 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-03 11:25 Vivek Goyal
2005-06-03 11:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-06-03 15:24 ` Alan Stern
2005-06-03 18:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-03 18:21 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 18:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-04 13:18 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050607162143.GE29220@colo.lackof.org \
--to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=awilliam@fc.hp.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox