From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261562AbVFHT2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:28:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261567AbVFHT2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:28:43 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:59538 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261562AbVFHT2g (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:28:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:28:53 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Chris Friesen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, mingo@elte.hu, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread Message-ID: <20050608192853.GE1295@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com References: <20050608022646.GA3158@us.ibm.com> <42A73D15.6080201@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A73D15.6080201@nortel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:46:45PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Nice writeup. Glad you liked it! > I think you mixed up the "weaknesses" section between "nested OS" and > "dual-os/dual-core". Good catch! I have moved the sentence: The pair of cores will be more expensive than a single core, though one might use virtualization to emulate the two CPUs. from "nested OS" to "dual-os/dual-core". Thanx, Paul