From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262480AbVFIVVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:21:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262484AbVFIVVV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:21:21 -0400 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:2316 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262480AbVFIVUb (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:20:31 -0400 From: Nick Warne To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Has anyone had problems with GCC 4.0 and the kernel? Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:20:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506092220.12973.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The 2.4 kernels need fair amounts of patching, > 99% of which is to prevent compile-time errors. These patches > are not yet merged into the standard 2.4 tree and may never be. So does this mean GCC 4.x is a no-go for people still using kernel 2.4.x? Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..."