From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262465AbVFIXvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:51:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbVFIXvF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:51:05 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:41983 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262504AbVFIXuQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:50:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:50:26 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Tim Bird Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, mingo@elte.hu, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread Message-ID: <20050609235026.GE1297@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com References: <20050608022646.GA3158@us.ibm.com> <42A8D1F3.8070408@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A8D1F3.8070408@am.sony.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:34:11PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Midway through the recent "RT patch acceptance" thread, someone mentioned > > that it might be good to summarize the various approaches. The following > > is an attempt to do just this, with an eye to providing a reasonable > > framework for future discussion. > > > > Thoughts? Errors? Omissions? > > I haven't finished it, but it looks great so far. Are you planning to > repost it to LKML, or otherwise publish it somewhere, after incorporating > feedback? Glad you like it! I figured on sending out an update sometime next week, after incorporating feedback. > If you don't mind, I would like to put a copy on the CELF wiki. But > if it's going to have a home elsewhere, I don't want to create a > duplicate copy. As long as questions, comments, and suggestions get pointed back to me, feel free! I may do a more formal writeup in a couple of months, if there is enough added content of interest. Thanx, Paul