From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261309AbVFJWhp@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261309AbVFJWhp (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:37:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261308AbVFJWhp
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:37:45 -0400
Received: from smtp.lnxw.com ([207.21.185.24]:51466 "EHLO smtp.lnxw.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261327AbVFJWhg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:37:36 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:43:13 -0700
To: Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>
Cc: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
       "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
       Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
       pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
       ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org,
       akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
Message-ID: <20050610224313.GA21618@nietzsche.lynx.com>
References: <20050608022646.GA3158@us.ibm.com> <42A8D1F3.8070408@am.sony.com> <20050609235026.GE1297@us.ibm.com> <1118372388.32270.6.camel@mindpipe> <20050610154745.GA1300@us.ibm.com> <20050610173728.GA6564@g5.random> <20050610193926.GA19568@nietzsche.lynx.com> <42A9F788.2040107@opersys.com> <20050610223724.GA20853@nietzsche.lynx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050610223724.GA20853@nietzsche.lynx.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Bill Huey (hui) <bhuey@lnxw.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:37:24PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:26:48PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> > Bill, I know PREEMPT_RT is something you root for strongly. FWIW, however,
> > such statements are usually counter-productive.
> 
> Some of the comments from various folks are just intolerably paranoid
> and I'm frustrated by that.

Oh god,

	http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4721170330.html

The original thread and the summary got posted to "linuxdevices" today.

bill