From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261622AbVFKHQU (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:16:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261630AbVFKHQU (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:16:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59095 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261622AbVFKHQS (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:16:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:08:45 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kristian Benoit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1 Message-ID: <20050611070845.GA4609@elte.hu> References: <42AA6A6B.5040907@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AA6A6B.5040907@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org could you send me the .config you used for the PREEMPT_RT tests? Also, you used -47-08, which was well prior the current round of performance improvements, so you might want to re-run with something like -48-06 or better. Ingo