From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261781AbVFKTcs (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:32:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261775AbVFKTcr (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:32:47 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:31494 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261781AbVFKTc2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:32:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:32:22 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Nick Warne Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Has anyone had problems with GCC 4.0 and the kernel? Message-ID: <20050611193222.GI3770@stusta.de> References: <200506092220.12973.nick@linicks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506092220.12973.nick@linicks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:20:12PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > > The 2.4 kernels need fair amounts of patching, > > 99% of which is to prevent compile-time errors. These patches > > are not yet merged into the standard 2.4 tree and may never be. > > So does this mean GCC 4.x is a no-go for people still using kernel 2.4.x? AFAIR Mikael wanted to provide his patches for compiling kernel 2.4 with gcc 4.0 somewhere. But they will most likely never go into into the official 2.4 kernel. > Nick cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed