From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdietrich@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:03:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050611200352.GA1477@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.05.10506112123260.2917-100000@da410.phys.au.dk>
* Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote:
> > the jury is still out on the accuracy of those numbers. The test had
> > RT_DEADLOCK_DETECT (and other -RT debugging features) turned on, which
> > mostly work with interrupts disabled. The other question is how were
> > interrupt response times measured.
> >
> You would accept a patch where I made this stuff optional?
I'm not sure why. The soft-flag based local_irq_disable() should in fact
be a tiny bit faster than the cli based approach, on a fair number of
CPUs. But it should definitely not be slower in any measurable way.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-11 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 7:08 [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal Daniel Walker
2005-06-08 11:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-08 20:33 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-09 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-10 23:37 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 0:20 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 13:13 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 13:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 14:32 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 16:36 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 17:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-11 18:40 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-12 0:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-12 0:15 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-12 0:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-12 0:24 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 19:34 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 19:44 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 19:53 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 20:23 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 22:59 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 5:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-06-13 6:20 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 12:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-06-11 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-06-11 20:51 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 23:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-11 23:50 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 0:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-12 0:09 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-12 0:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-06-12 1:05 ` Gene Heskett
2005-06-13 12:03 ` Paulo Marques
2005-06-13 12:19 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-12 4:50 ` cutaway
2005-06-12 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 11:15 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-12 11:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-13 7:01 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 7:53 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-13 8:05 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 8:54 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-13 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 15:28 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 4:31 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 4:32 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 4:56 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 4:55 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 5:16 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 5:14 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 5:27 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 15:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-12 15:46 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 19:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 17:02 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-13 7:08 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 7:44 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-13 7:53 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-13 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 16:41 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 17:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 19:29 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 20:02 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 16:19 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 15:00 ` Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11 16:45 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 16:53 ` Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11 17:13 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 17:22 ` Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11 17:25 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 17:29 ` Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11 17:30 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 17:55 ` Mika Penttilä
2005-06-11 16:28 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 16:46 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 16:09 ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-11 16:31 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-06-11 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-11 22:44 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-06-12 6:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-13 4:39 ` [RT] " Steven Rostedt
2005-06-16 5:35 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050611200352.GA1477@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox