public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de,
	tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
	dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	rpm@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 13:14:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050611201422.GA1299@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42AA6A6B.5040907@opersys.com>

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:36:59AM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> For the past few weeks, we've been conducting comparison tests between
> PREEMPT_RT and the Adeos nanokernel. As was clear from previous discussion,
> we've been open to be proven wrong regarding endorsement of either method.
> Hence, this comparison was done in order to better understand the impact
> of each method vis-a-vis vanilla Linux.

I took a quick look through, and am quite impressed.  I have not yet
had a chance to go through it carefully (much less read the read of
the thread), but wanted to say "thank you!!!" for doing the measurements.

I am sure that there will be some, umm, "controversy" over the benchmark
and measurement methodology, but getting some agreement on what to
measure and how to measure it will be very valuable.

My guess is that there will end up being more than one benchmark, given
the large variety of RT apps out there, but who knows?

						Thanx, Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-11 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-11  4:36 PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1 Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11  6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-11  9:15   ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-11 14:15     ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-12 15:48       ` Philippe Gerum
2005-06-11 14:39     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 22:14       ` Philippe Gerum
2005-06-11 13:57   ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11 14:28   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-06-11  7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11  7:44   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-11  9:27     ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-12 15:31       ` Philippe Gerum
2005-06-11 14:28     ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11 10:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 14:23     ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11 14:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 14:31   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 14:52     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 14:52       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 17:40       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 18:15         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 18:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 22:27             ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 10:47           ` James R Bruce
2005-06-12 14:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-13  2:39               ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-11 22:31   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12  6:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 15:26       ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-12 19:29       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 20:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-13  0:45           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-13  1:20             ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13  5:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12 22:20     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-12 23:03       ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13  0:53         ` randy_dunlap
2005-06-13  1:12           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13  6:51           ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-06-13 15:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-13 15:12       ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-11 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-12  4:21   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-11 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-06-11 22:33   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-12 20:36     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-12 11:11 ` James R Bruce
2005-06-12 19:49   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-13  2:32     ` Kristian Benoit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050611201422.GA1299@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=kbenoit@opersys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox