From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
To: Armin Schindler <armin@melware.de>
Cc: Greg K-H <greg@kroah.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:29:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506120929.03212.tomlins@cam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506121042420.30907@phoenix.one.melware.de>
On Sunday 12 June 2005 04:44, Armin Schindler wrote:
> It didn't follow the development, is devfs now obsolete in kernel?
> If not, these funktions still makes sense.
>
Armin,
>From Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
What: devfs
When: July 2005
Files: fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h and assorted devfs
function calls throughout the kernel tree
Why: It has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
Who: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
This should not a surprise to anyone...
Ed Tomlinson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-12 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <11184761102127@kroah.com>
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs from the partition code Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs from the init code Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_*_tape() functions from the kernel tree Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_dir() function " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_symlink() " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_bdev() " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_remove() " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the devfs_fs_kernel.h file from the tree Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the miscdevice devfs_name field as it's no longer needed Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the gendisk " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the uart_driver " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the videodevice " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the ide drive " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the line_driver " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the scsi_disk " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the tty_driver " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Remove the mode field from usb_class_driver " Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Rename TTY_DRIVER_NO_DEVFS to TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV Greg KH
2005-06-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] Last little devfs cleanups throughout the kernel tree Greg KH
2005-06-11 19:05 ` [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from " Adrian Bunk
2005-06-13 18:15 ` Greg KH
2005-06-12 8:44 ` Armin Schindler
2005-06-12 13:29 ` Ed Tomlinson [this message]
2005-06-12 13:51 ` Armin Schindler
2005-06-12 15:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-12 15:36 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-06-12 18:32 ` Armin Schindler
2005-06-13 18:13 ` Greg KH
2005-06-14 6:54 ` Armin Schindler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506120929.03212.tomlins@cam.org \
--to=tomlins@cam.org \
--cc=armin@melware.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox