From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261210AbVFLUgj (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:36:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261212AbVFLUgj (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:36:39 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:32739 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261210AbVFLUgh (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:36:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:36:59 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Kristian Benoit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1 Message-ID: <20050612203659.GA1340@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com References: <42AA6A6B.5040907@opersys.com> <20050611201422.GA1299@us.ibm.com> <42AB66D1.20205@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AB66D1.20205@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 06:33:53PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > My guess is that there will end up being more than one benchmark, given > > the large variety of RT apps out there, but who knows? > > I don't doubt. We just wanted to get people's attention to such aspects. > We believe that the framework we've built is general enough that others > will find it simple to graft their own tests on top and otherwise extend > it to their needs. > > In any case, having more serious benchmarks published will certainly do > no harm. Sounds good, agreed! Thanx, Paul