From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261307AbVFNHmP (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:42:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261310AbVFNHmP (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:42:15 -0400 Received: from smtp823.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.171.9]:34213 "HELO smtp823.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261307AbVFNHmM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:42:12 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: Input sysbsystema and hotplug Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 02:42:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kay Sievers , Greg KH , Vojtech Pavlik , LKML , Andrew Morton References: <200506131607.51736.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <200506131705.30159.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <42AE8820.2010102@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <42AE8820.2010102@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506140242.08982.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 14 June 2005 02:32, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > And yes, we should break compability and come up with a clean > implementation. But those pesky users scream every time we break their mice ;) > And as the original input event is an abomination I > don't see the point in keeping compability with a broken interface. > Why is it abomination (aside from using old mechanism to call hotplug)? It looks like it transmits all data necessary to load appropriate input handler... -- Dmitry