From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262163AbVFRTFi (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:05:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262199AbVFRTFi (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:05:38 -0400 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:6675 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262163AbVFRTFa (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:05:30 -0400 From: Nick Warne To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12 Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:05:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506182005.28254.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Steven Rostedt wrote: > This is somewhat experimental at this time, but it should be safe, > as long as you aren't building this as a module and then removing it. > If unsure, say Y. Do not say M. > USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW) > -------------- > I really like my options. :-) > OK, I have CONFIG_USB as a module, but I really thought that this was > pretty amusing. Heh. When I was sussing 2.6.12 stuff today, I really thought it was me buggering up something. So after reading a lot, I wondered (neurotically) if I was doing anything wrong (after all this time, it's likely). > make help reveals: randconfig - New config with random answer to all options So 'make randconfig' is the one to use! What one earth is that for? Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..."