From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262245AbVFRU0k (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:26:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262247AbVFRU0k (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:26:40 -0400 Received: from serv4.servweb.de ([82.96.83.76]:33956 "EHLO serv4.servweb.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262245AbVFRU0c (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:26:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:26:24 +0200 From: Patrick Plattes To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] optimization for sys_semtimedop() (was: Opening Day for OpenSolaris) Message-ID: <20050618202624.GA11512@erdbeere.net> References: <42AF12A8.4060007@colorfullife.com> <42AFB94D.5010603@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AFB94D.5010603@colorfullife.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:14:53AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Jim: From my understanding of the CDDL, only a file that "contains any > part of the Original Software" must be licensed under the CDDL, there > are no restrictions (except possibly patents, but I assume that even the > USPTO won't grant a patent on such a trivial idea) on using methods or > ideas from OpenSolaris in software that uses other licenses. > Is that correct? Hello, Patch: The patch looks fine and compiles clean. CDDL: What is the definition of 'part'? IMHO we need a debate how to work with OpenSolaris ideas and the debate must me done by lawyers, not by kernel hacker. Other: sem.c is hard to read - for me. Long functions and a lot of gotos confusing me. is this only my problem or is it really hard to understand? cu pp