From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262205AbVFRXq7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:46:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262206AbVFRXq7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:46:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37335 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262205AbVFRXq6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:46:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:46:52 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: David L Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad? Message-ID: <20050618234651.GD23688@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20050618225238.GB23688@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 04:19:58PM -0700, David L wrote: > >that's only part of the source though... can you point at the full one ? > > I'm pretty sure that's all the source... there was some documentation that the sources for CLlogic2 and CLlogic3 are missing....