public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.12] XFS: Undeletable directory
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:04:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050620070459.GB1549@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506191904.49639.lkml@kcore.org>

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello lists,
> 
> I've had some XFS troubles today, and after cleaning up with xfs_repair and so 
> I'm stuck with one undeletable directory in /lost+found:
> 
> precious:/lost+found# ls -l
> total 8
> drwxrwxrwx  2 root root 8192 Jun 19  2005 4207214
> precious:/lost+found# rm -r 4207214
> rm: cannot remove directory `4207214': Directory not empty
> precious:/lost+found# ls -l 4207214/
> total 0
> precious:/lost+found# 
> 
> So there's one dir 4207214 there, and i can rename it and whatever, just not 
> remove it.
> 
> xfs_repair didn't solve the problem.
> 
> Any ideas?

What does:  xfs_db -r -c 'inode 4207214' -c print /dev/XXX
report?

I have seen a similar thing once before, awhile back, where the
directory inode was "empty" (only . and ..) and hence should've
been in shortform, but other fields indicated the inode was in
extent form still.  Never got to the bottom of it... I'd guess
there's somehow a case where the kernel XFS code can miss this
transformation - not sure where/how though.

If it comes to it, you can always zero out individual inode fields
for that inode in xfs_db (with -x option to enable write mode) and
then xfs_repair should be able to get past it.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-20  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-19 17:04 [2.6.12] XFS: Undeletable directory Jan De Luyck
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.63.0506191924430.7686@hobbybop>
2005-06-19 18:34   ` Jan De Luyck
2005-06-19 23:02     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-06-20 10:20       ` Jan De Luyck
2005-06-20  7:04 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2005-06-20 10:25   ` Jan De Luyck
2005-06-21  1:15     ` Federico Sevilla III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050620070459.GB1549@frodo \
    --to=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=lkml@kcore.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox