From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261200AbVFTRBN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:01:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261341AbVFTRBN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:01:13 -0400 Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56]:19631 "EHLO sccrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261200AbVFTRBI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:01:08 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc() Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:00:04 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Jesper Juhl , Andrew Morton , Walt Drummond , Stephane Eranian , linux-kernel References: <17073.59550.679017.387092@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <17073.59550.679017.387092@napali.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506201000.04665.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, June 16, 2005 2:01 pm, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:21:50 +0200 (CEST), Jesper Juhl > >>>>> said: > > Jesper> I send in the patch below a while back but never recieved > Jesper> any response. Now I'm resending it in the hope that it > Jesper> might be added to -mm. The patch still applies cleanly to > Jesper> 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 > > The patch looks fine to me. Yep, looks good. I was the one that introduced this bug. It's hard to hit, but we should still fix it. Thanks Jesper. Acked-by: Jesse Barnes Jesse