From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261165AbVFTKp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:45:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261188AbVFTKpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:45:55 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:2777 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbVFTKpt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:45:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:45:44 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomasz K?oczko Cc: James Bottomley , Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Q: qla23xxx and lpfc (Was: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.12) Message-ID: <20050620104544.GA28488@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Tomasz K?oczko , James Bottomley , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel References: <1119103586.4984.5.camel@mulgrave> <20050618141636.GA4112@infradead.org> <20050618174558.GX9153@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1119260140.6099.0.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:33:49PM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote: > Included in vanilla 2.6.12 qla23xxx 8.00.02b5 is for me unuseable (fails > on scaning luns and oopses on array controler reset) on x86_64 with > qla2300 and for me works only version 8.01.00b2. > Is it will be possible include this version in official tree ? As said above a bad patch from Qlogic went in and Linus didn't pull the release critical fixes tree before release. It'll be fixed in 2.6.12.1. 8.01.00b2 is full of crap and despite the higher version number actually a regression vs the kernel driver in various aspects. > Also is it will be possible include Emulex lpfc driver to official tree ? See drivers/scsi/lpfc/