From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:04:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050620110406.GA28931@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B6B733.24349.B0B7F9@rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:31:48PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> it seems you don't like the patch for some personal reasons, and now your are
> trying to find arguments against it. The best method to get the perfomance
> implications is trying it (the patched kernel).
Roman is just asking for explanations. The patches approach might be really
great but if no one understands it that doesn't help. And it's a very sensitive
part of the kernel so it needs to be understood very well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-20 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-18 2:56 [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem for -mm (v.B3) john stultz
2005-06-18 2:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes, part 1 " john stultz
2005-06-18 2:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes, part 2 " john stultz
2005-06-18 3:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes, part 3 " john stultz
2005-06-18 3:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes, part 4 " john stultz
2005-06-18 3:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] new timeofday i386 specific timesources " john stultz
2005-06-18 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] new timeofday core subsystem " Roman Zippel
2005-06-20 7:01 ` Ulrich Windl
2005-06-20 10:22 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-20 10:31 ` Ulrich Windl
2005-06-20 10:54 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-20 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-06-20 17:09 ` john stultz
2005-06-20 18:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-20 21:53 ` john stultz
2005-06-20 23:44 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-21 14:55 ` Chris Friesen
2005-06-21 17:20 ` john stultz
2005-06-21 6:26 ` Ulrich Windl
2005-06-20 22:05 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-20 23:40 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-20 23:55 ` john stultz
2005-06-21 15:08 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-22 0:57 ` john stultz
2005-06-22 2:39 ` john stultz
2005-06-22 19:45 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-23 0:29 ` john stultz
2005-06-23 21:59 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-24 0:33 ` john stultz
2005-06-24 10:58 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-21 6:42 ` Ulrich Windl
2005-06-21 15:13 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050620110406.GA28931@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox