public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wli@holomorphy.com, zab@zabbo.net, mason@suse.com,
	ysaito@hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: Pending AIO work/patches
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:10:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050620181007.GA4031@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050620120154.GA4810@in.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:31:54PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> (1) Updating AIO to use wait-bit based filtered wakeups (me/wli)
> 	Status: Updated to 2.6.12-rc6, needs review
> (2) Buffered filesystem AIO read/write (me/Ben)
> 	Status: aio write: Updated to 2.6.12-rc6, needs review
> 	Status: aio read : Needs rework against readahead changes in mainline

I've looked over the patches from today and they seem quite sane.  Comments 
pending...

> (3) POSIX AIO support (Bull: Laurent/Sebastian or Oracle: Joel)
> 	Status: Needs review and discussion ?

The latest version incorporates changes from the last round of feedback 
(great work Sebastien!) and updates the library license, so people should 
definately take a closer look.  This includes the necessary changes for 
in-kernel signal support, as well as minimal conversion done on iocbs (the 
layout matches the in-kernel iocb).

A quick reading shows that most of it looks quite good.  I have to stare 
at the cancellation code a bit more closely, though.

> (4) AIO for pipes (Chris Mason)
> 	Status: Needs update to latest kernels

This likely needs a rewrite with whatever the final semaphore operations 
turn out to look like, as it gets very easy to convert down() into 
aio_down() and that minimises the changes to the code.

> (5) Asynchronous semaphore implementation (Ben/Trond?)
> 	Status: Posted - under development & discussion

I got the aio_down() variant working with cancellation now, and should be 
able to post an updated series of patches against 2.6.12 shortly.

> (6) epoll - AIO integration (Zach Brown/Feng Zhou/wli)
> 	Status: Needs resurrection ?

What are folks thoughts in this area?  Zach's patches took the approach of 
making multishot iocbs possible, which helped avoid the overhead of plain 
aio_poll's command setup, which was quite visible in pipetest.  Zach -- did 
you do any benchmarking on your aio-epoll patches?

> (7) Vector AIO (aio readv/writev) (Yasushi Saito)
> 	Status: Needs resurrection ?

Zach also made some noises about this recently...

		-ben
-- 
"Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once." -- John Wheeler

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-20 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-20 12:01 Pending AIO work/patches Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 13:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-06-20 14:32 ` Sébastien Dugué
2005-06-20 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/6] Integrate AIO with wait-bit based filtered wakeups Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:20   ` [PATCH 1/6] Add a wait queue argument to wait_bit action() Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:24   ` [PATCH 2/6] Rename __lock_page to lock_page_slow Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-28 16:52     ` Zach Brown
2005-06-29  9:51       ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-07-24 22:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-24 22:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-26  1:10         ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:28   ` [PATCH 3/6] Interfaces to initialize and to test a wait_bit key Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:30   ` [PATCH 4/6] Add default io wait bit field in task struct Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:33   ` [PATCH 5/6] AIO wait bit and AIO wake bit for filtered wakeups Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 16:36   ` [PATCH 6/6] AIO wait page and AIO lock page Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-30 15:49   ` [PATCH 0/6] Integrate AIO with wait-bit based filtered wakeups Sébastien Dugué
2005-07-01  7:37     ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-20 18:10 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2005-06-20 18:51   ` Pending AIO work/patches Zach Brown
2005-06-21  7:36   ` Sébastien Dugué
2005-06-21 19:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-24 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] Buffered filesystem AIO read/write Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-24 11:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] Filesystem AIO read Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-24 11:40   ` [PATCH 2/2] Filesystem AIO write Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-06-24 16:10   ` [PATCH 0/2] Buffered filesystem AIO read/write Jeremy Allison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050620181007.GA4031@kvack.org \
    --to=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=ysaito@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=zab@zabbo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox