From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261827AbVFTXUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:20:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261785AbVFTXAB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:00:01 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([216.27.176.166]:4827 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261746AbVFTVzt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:55:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:55:40 -0700 From: Matt Mackall To: aq Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12 Message-ID: <20050620215540.GA14426@waste.org> References: <200506182005.28254.nick@linicks.net> <9a8748490506181233675f2fd5@mail.gmail.com> <9cde8bff0506181839d41aab3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9cde8bff0506181839d41aab3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:39:59PM -0700, aq wrote: > the version number is a little bit confused here: if I want to upgrade > from for example 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12, which patch should I get? > > anybody knows if Matt will upgrade his ketchup for the new versioning > system soon? otherwise, I might spend some time to hack it up. Ketchup should already do 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12 just fine. What's currently not handled are -git snapshots. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.