From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261433AbVFUFsy (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:48:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261340AbVFUFpD (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:45:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:17566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbVFTWku (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:40:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:40:39 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Nick Warne Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Two agpgart probes at boot. Message-ID: <20050620224039.GA3990@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Nick Warne , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200506171943.40592.nick@linicks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506171943.40592.nick@linicks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:43:40PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anybody point me in the direction of why I get 'what appears' to be two > agpgart probes on boot (2.6.11.12 on updated Slack 10): > > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0. > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 4x mode > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 4x mode > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0. > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 4x mode > Jun 17 18:40:27 linuxamd kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 4x mode These messages aren't probing messages per se. They happen when something (typically X) opens /dev/agpgart and sets up dri. It'll get logged every time that X gets restarted. That there are two of them with the same datestamp is odd though. For some reason your X did this twice. Dave