From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] lib/zlib*: possible cleanups
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:37:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050621133738.GM3666@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050620172920.541f4112.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:29:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> >
> > - #if 0 the following unused functions:
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateSetDictionary
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateParams
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate.c: zlib_deflateCopy
> > - zlib_inflate/infblock.c: zlib_inflate_set_dictionary
> > - zlib_inflate/infblock.c: zlib_inflate_blocks_sync_point
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_sync.c: zlib_inflateSync
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_sync.c: zlib_inflateSyncPoint
>
> OK...
>
> > - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.c: zlib_deflateCopy
> > - zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.c: zlib_deflateParams
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_syms.c: zlib_inflateSync
> > - zlib_inflate/inflate_syms.c: zlib_inflateSyncPoint
>
> Adrian, I've dropped just about every "remove the following unneeded
> EXPORT_SYMBOL's" I've seen in the past several months. We've been round this
> numerous times.
>
> The question is, who are we screwing if we remove these?
>
> It's difficult to answer, but we need to answer it.
I'm sorry, but I'm not getting your point:
First, you ACK the part of my patch to #if 0 unused functions.
Then you complain that I've documented which EXPORT_SYMBOL's I have to
remove because I have #if 0'ed the functions they are exporting.
Will the patch be OK for you if I'll simply remove the part of the patch
description stating which of the #if 0'ed functions had been exported?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-21 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-20 23:43 [2.6 patch] lib/zlib*: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2005-06-21 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 13:37 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-06-27 8:51 ` Kjartan Maraas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-30 20:02 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-30 0:28 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-17 0:08 Adrian Bunk
2005-05-06 21:25 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050621133738.GM3666@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox