Re: reiser4 plugins

Bernd Eckenfels
2005-06-24T11:17:37Z

In article <42BBB47C.9010002@slaphack.com> you wrote:
> How about a poor-man's isolation -- any process other than that
> responsible for the transaction sees a consistent state, never a
> transaction-in-progress. I'm sure there's a name for that.

It is Isolation Level Serializeable. It is the less performant isolation
level and still can generate deadlocks if you have two process doing
transactions.

A more simpler solution would be that process without transactions never see
infligt tx and a second process simple returnes a retry error if touching a
locked ressource.

Bernd