Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

Nikita Danilov
2005-06-26T10:03:31Z

Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> writes:

> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:23:41 -0700, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> said:
>
>>>> assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0);
>
>> Lots of people like corporate anonymity. Some don't. I don't. I
>> like knowing who wrote what. ...
>
> For what it's worth (I know: not much), I like the named asserts in
> Reiser4/Reiserfs. Although I haven't been bitten by any BUGs yet (maybe
> I'm just lucky), whenever I see these on the mailing list, it gives the
> impression that the users are interacting more directly with the
> developers, and it helps us to get to know the developers better.
>
> If people really want more standard-looking identifiers, I think Namesys
> should keep the names and make a hybrid identifier, like
> "nikita-123(<file>:<line>)"

This already happens: together with <uid>-<serial>, reiser4 outputs
__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, and a bunch of other stuff:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
reiser4[xine(11262)]: txn_end (fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:504)[nominaodiosasunt-2967]:
code: -2 at fs/reiser4/search.c:1285
reiser4 panicked cowardly: assertion failed: lock_stack_isclean(get_current_lock_stack())
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nikita.