From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262599AbVFVXg0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:36:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262598AbVFVXgY (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:36:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:26753 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262599AbVFVXdM (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:33:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:32:56 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Carsten Otte Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status Message-ID: <20050622233256.GC9153@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <42B831B4.9020603@pobox.com> <20050621132204.1b57b6ba.akpm@osdl.org> <5c77e707050621142841ad3225@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c77e707050621142841ad3225@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Carsten Otte (cotte.de@gmail.com) wrote: > On 6/21/05, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > and indeed vendors ARE shipping > > > other crashdump methods. > > > > Which ones? > For 390, we ship standalone bootable crashdump tools with both sles > and rhel. As for kexec, I'd like to see a kexec based 390 bootloader > in the future which would be more flexible then our current one. So > I'd like to vote for merging kexec/kdump. Xen is making similar noises w.r.t. using kexec for flexible bootloader. thanks, -chris