From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel@mikebell.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:10:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623091034.A26836@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506222108.50905.david-b@pacbell.net>; from david-b@pacbell.net on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:08:50PM -0700
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:08:50PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I'd agree that embedded setups are the ones that have been slowest to
> switch over, for various reasons. One of them is that many LKML folk
> ignore embedded systems issues; "just PC class or better".
I don't think that's a fair comment - however I never read any of those
udev/devfs flamewars. As the lead developer of an embedded architecture,
I find that many people here do not take that attitude.
More the problem is that many embedded folk aren't here to air their
*technical* arguments because they can't keep up with the lkml traffic
level.
Consequently, lkml folk don't get the feedback from embedded folk, and
hence probably why udev doesn't/didn't work with ash.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-23 4:08 [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git David Brownell
2005-06-23 6:21 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 8:10 ` Russell King [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-23 5:08 David Brownell
2005-06-23 5:22 ` Bill Gatliff
2005-06-21 6:29 Greg KH
2005-06-21 6:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 13:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-21 15:10 ` Greg KH
2005-06-21 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 20:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-21 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 21:16 ` Greg KH
2005-06-21 21:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-06-23 1:00 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 2:13 ` Bill Gatliff
2005-06-23 4:59 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:14 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 6:26 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:36 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 7:03 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 19:54 ` Kay Sievers
2005-06-23 6:34 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:37 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 6:47 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 6:38 ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23 6:28 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 6:48 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 8:29 ` Mike Bell
2005-06-23 12:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-24 8:24 ` Greg KH
2005-06-23 15:13 ` Per Liden
2005-07-18 16:36 ` Richard Gooch
2005-07-18 20:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-18 22:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-07-19 2:51 ` Jim Crilly
2005-06-21 17:35 ` Carsten Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623091034.A26836@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=kernel@mikebell.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox