From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:23:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623142335.A5564@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
I hope there's no need to explain this in the email; if there is, the
entry isn't good enough. 8)
However, wouldn't it be a good idea if this file was ordered by "when" ?
A quick scan of the file reveals a couple of overdue/forgotten items
(maybe they happened but the entry in the file got missed?):
What: ACPI S4bios support
When: May 2005
What: register_ioctl32_conversion() / unregister_ioctl32_conversion()
When: April 2005
diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x *.orig -x *.rej orig/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt linux/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- orig/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt Sat May 28 20:58:15 2005
+++ linux/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt Thu Jun 23 14:19:05 2005
@@ -83,3 +83,13 @@ Why: Deprecated in favour of the new ioc
more efficient. You should really be using libraw1394 for raw1394
access anyway.
Who: Jody McIntyre <scjody@steamballoon.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
+What: register_serial/unregister_serial
+When: December 2005
+Why: This interface does not allow serial ports to be registered against
+ a struct device, and as such does not allow correct power management
+ of such ports. 8250-based ports should use serial8250_register_port
+ and serial8250_unregister_port instead.
+Who: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-23 13:23 Russell King [this message]
2005-06-23 13:54 ` [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 14:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-23 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 18:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 21:38 ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 19:13 ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-25 2:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-25 9:47 ` Russell King
2005-06-25 9:57 ` Russell King
2005-06-27 0:36 ` David McCullough
2005-06-27 9:30 ` Russell King
2005-07-14 19:33 ` Russell King
2005-08-12 17:30 ` Max Asbock
2005-08-15 8:42 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623142335.A5564@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox