public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
Date: 23 Jun 2005 18:24:48 +0200
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:24:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623162448.GA5430@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050623140316.GH3749@stusta.de>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:03:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> >...
> > However, wouldn't it be a good idea if this file was ordered by "when" ?
> > A quick scan of the file reveals a couple of overdue/forgotten items
> > (maybe they happened but the entry in the file got missed?):
> >...
> > What:   register_ioctl32_conversion() / unregister_ioctl32_conversion()
> > When:   April 2005
> >...
> 
> The removal (including the removal of the feature-removal-schedule.txt 
> entry) is already in -mm.

Ok, but I hope whoever did that fixed the locking in the compat
path too. e.g. the BKL is not needed anymore.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-23 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-23 13:23 [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file Russell King
2005-06-23 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 14:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-06-23 16:24   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-06-23 18:32   ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-23 21:38     ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 19:13   ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-25  2:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-25  9:47 ` Russell King
2005-06-25  9:57   ` Russell King
2005-06-27  0:36   ` David McCullough
2005-06-27  9:30     ` Russell King
2005-07-14 19:33 ` Russell King
2005-08-12 17:30   ` Max Asbock
2005-08-15  8:42     ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050623162448.GA5430@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox