From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263189AbVFXHU6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:20:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263191AbVFXHU5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:20:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:53148 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263189AbVFXHUv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:20:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:20:19 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Shailabh Nagar Cc: Gerrit Huizenga , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, Chandra Seetharaman , Hubertus Franke , Shailabh Nagar Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting Message-ID: <20050624072019.GA7191@elte.hu> References: <20050623061552.833852000@w-gerrit.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050623061754.354811000@w-gerrit.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050623091655.GA28722@elte.hu> <20050623093732.GA30848@elte.hu> <42BAF7AD.2050208@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42BAF7AD.2050208@watson.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Shailabh Nagar wrote: > Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok > or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ? wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function). But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself. Ingo