Re: [PATCH] Kernel .patches support

[Christian Hesse <mail@earthworm.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]

On Friday 24 June 2005 09:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:58:27PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > every time I apply a patch to my kernel tree I (or my scripts) make an
> >
> > echo $PATCHNAME $PATCHVERSION >> .patches
> >
> > This patch makes the file accessible via /proc/patches.gz. I think this
> > can be handy if you want to know what patches you (or your distributor)
> > applied to your running kernel...
> >...
> > Let me know what you think.
>
> To be honest, I'm not a fan of it.
>
> If e.g. looking at a Debian kernel source that has 289 different patches
> with names like tty-locking-fixes7 applied, you'll see that this often
> won't give you much valuable information.

You can search Debian lists, archives, ... for "tty-locking-fixes7". After 
that you probably know what the fix is good for.

On the other hand if there is a security fix in a Debian list you can check if 
your kernel is patched by running "zcat /proc/patches.gz | grep 
security-fix-foo-bar".

> You'd need an uniform naming convention for patches across
> distributions, and I don't think such things are worth the effort.

If a distribution has a naming convention for itself this patch can already be 
useful I think. Even without it can be.

-- 
Christian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]