From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261339AbVFYVI5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:08:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261341AbVFYVI4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:08:56 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:10948 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261339AbVFYVIm (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:08:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:08:20 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Pekka Enberg , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Jeff Mahoney , penberg@gmail.com, ak@suse.de, flx@namesys.com, zam@namesys.com, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status Message-ID: <20050625210820.GA26946@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Hans Reiser , Pekka Enberg , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Jeff Mahoney , penberg@gmail.com, ak@suse.de, flx@namesys.com, zam@namesys.com, vs@thebsh.namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com References: <42B86027.3090001@namesys.com> <20050621195642.GD14251@wotan.suse.de> <42B8C0FF.2010800@namesys.com> <84144f0205062223226d560e41@mail.gmail.com> <42BB0151.3030904@suse.de> <20050623114318.5ae13514.akpm@osdl.org> <20050623193247.GC6814@suse.de> <1119717967.9392.2.camel@localhost> <42BDAF3D.6060809@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42BDAF3D.6060809@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:23:41PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > >> > >> assert("trace_hash-89", is_hashed(foo) != 0); > >> > Lots of people like corporate anonymity. Some don't. I don't. I like > knowing who wrote what. It helps me know who to pay how much. It helps > me know who to forward the bug report to. Losing your anonymity > exposes you, mostly for better since more communication is on balance a > good thing, but the fear is there for some. I don't think we can agree > on this, it is an issue of the soul. Fallacy. The assert doesn't tell you who is at fault; it tells you who placed the assert which triggered; it could have triggered due to bugs caused by anyone, including the propietary binary-only module from Nvidia which the user loaded into his system.... - Ted